One Year of Hamas: What Now?

The International Crisis Group, whose Middle East division is led by CALME luminary Robert Malley, released a report last week titled “After Mecca: Engaging Hamas.”  The report details the status of political developments in the Palestinian territories since Hamas took power one year ago, as well as how things may or may not have changed since Fatah and Hamas finalized the Mecca Accord.   In short, the paper argues that it is time for the international community to figure out a way to engage Hamas.  Isolating them, the report argues, has only further stalled any measure of progress toward peace and, in fact, increased the internecine violence.  Looking at the situation now, the report suggests the following:

The main objective, of course, is to revive the peace process and move toward a two-state solution. Critics of the Mecca Agreement and the national unity government, chiefly the U.S. and Israel, call it an impediment to progress – an odd characterisation considering there was no peace process before Hamas won the elections and no peace process before Fatah agreed to join its government. It is also wrong. Mecca is a prerequisite for a peace process not an obstacle to it. Without a Hamas-Fatah power-sharing agreement and as long as the Islamists feel marginalised, unable to govern and in an existential struggle for survival, there can be no sustainable diplomacy. With sizeable public support, Hamas can deny Abbas the legitimacy required to make difficult concessions. It can launch attacks on Israel to torpedo talks. And in or out of office it can easily prevent a referendum designed to ratify any potential agreement.

If the international community is serious about its proclaimed goals, it will help bring stability to the Palestinians and broker a comprehensive Israeli-Palestinian ceasefire, permit the unity government to govern and press for meaningful negotiations between Abbas and Olmert. It will see Mecca as an opportunity to revive the peace process, rather than as yet another excuse to bury it.

To read the full report, please click here.

Explore posts in the same categories: Israel, Middle East, Middle East Peace, Palestinians, Two State Solution, U.S. Role

One Comment on “One Year of Hamas: What Now?”

  1. Peter H Says:

    There is an interesting proposal discussed by Hamas and Israelis, and is reproduced in the Palestine-Israel Journal:


    1- Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank to an agreed temporary line.
    2- A five-year Armistice/Hudna”1″, i.e., no Palestinian attacks in Israel or on Israelis anywhere, and no Israeli attacks in Palestinian Territory or on Palestinians anywhere.
    3- No Israeli steps to change the status quo that existed in areas outside the territory under Israeli control on the June 4, 1967 lines. No houses to be built in settlements, no roads or any change to the landscape.
    4- Free and unhindered access for Palestinians to East Jerusalem and the rest of the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
    5- Free and unhindered travel from Gaza to the West Bank (and vice versa) as well as to Jordan and Egypt.
    6- International supervision: Any violation of points 1-5 will be considered as a violation of the Armistice/Hudna.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: